Good article this week in the New York Times about Google's relatively quiet effort to build a truly capable translation service. Doing real-time translation turns out to be an incredibly hard computing task and the best way so far to solve it is through brute force: feed a really powerful computer system (like Google's) billions of examples of words and let it crunch the statistical likelihood of what you mean. There are a number of apps, like Jibbigo, that purport to do this now, and I tested a handful of dedicated devices a couple of years ago, but none really lives up to the dream. If Google's system gets truly smart enough, it could roll out to smartphones and finally give us the instant-translator gadget that would truly change the way we travel—imagine being able to have a full conversation with someone in any country, no hand gestures required.
Let me know if you've come across any truly useful translation tools out there?
By Mike Haney on March 5, 2010 7:19 AM
|No Comments
There's not much today's best mobile navigation apps can't do (look for a more in-depth comparison in the magazine soon), and with two sales in the iTunes store right now, it's hard to find a reason not to have at least one on your iPhone.
If you don't already own a standalone GPS, go for TomTom's excellent app, now on sale for $50, less than you would pay for even the most discounted device. The app includes maps for all of the US stored on your phone, so you don't need a cell signal to use it and it works overseas without roaming charges (the downside is that you have to clear out more than a gigabyte of space on your phone). The app's big arrows and directions make you forget you're using a small screen, and its lane guidance is better than any GPS I've used. TomTom also enhances its directions with something called IQ Routes, which is basically intelligence constantly collected from users about the realities of the routes—so even if Route A looks faster on paper, it knows that at 4:30 pm on a weekday, Route B will likely get you there quicker, maybe because there's less traffic or fewer stoplights.
A pretty crisp photo I took with Palm Pre Plus, of the Chicago Symphony Orchestra performing at Carnegie Hall
In one way at least, I’m grateful to the lowlife who stole my iPhone last month. Without him, I wouldn’t have felt the urgency to find myself a new cell phone and discover that—contrary to what all the Apple zealots in my life tell me—attractive smartphone alternatives do exist. Better still, those other smartphones aren’t shackled to AT&T (if I had a penny for every dropped call, I might be able to afford to buy another iPhone before my contract expires). My two current favorites are the Palm Pre Plus and Google’s Nexus One, both of which I’ve been road-testing over the past several weeks. Neither one is perfect, but I’ve grown so fond of both, for very different reasons, that I’m having a tough time deciding which one I’ll choose for the long haul. Maybe it’s time for another Smartphone Smackdown. In the meantime, here’s how these two phones compare: READ MORE >>
By Mike Haney on February 24, 2010 2:00 PM
|No Comments
A closer look at the HP V1020H pocket camcorder from ubergizmo.com
A slough of camera announcements over the past week have got me thinking about upgrading my five-year-old point-and-shoot and DSLR. The good news is that today I could pretty easily replace both with a single camera, without breaking the bank, and getting a lot more features. Here are three cool cams in my sights:
This is the latest in a new category of camera called Micro Four-Thirds (catchy, I know). Developed by Olympus and Panasonic, it's essentially a new way of organizing the innards of a camera so that you get the big sensor and interchangeable lenses of an SLR with the compact body of a point-and-shoot. The downside is that they require new special lenses, but if you don't already have a collection from an SLR, they're worth looking at. This just announced cam looks to be the best yet, with a 12.3-megapixel sensor, lens-independent image stabilization, HD-video shooting, face detection and a cool retro pop-up flash. And, it's only $600, $200 cheaper than Olympus's last version. On sale in three colors in March.
This camera lives at that junction of point-and-shoot and SLR: nearly all the pro features, including RAW images and fast shooting, without the swappable lenses or high price tag. This one also sports a big three-inch swiveling AMOLED screen on the back—that jumble of letters means that it's brighter and better looking than the traditional LCD screens on cameras, and uses less battery. The only trade-off is that it doesn't shoot HD video, but it's only $450 (and like most cameras, probably cheaper online—I always check dealcam.com before buying). Out this spring.
I recently did a piece for the magazine about shooting travel video and became a pocket camcorder convert. There's something about their super-portability and incredible ease of use that awakened a desire to make movies I didn't know I had. Flip pioneered the field and still makes great cameras, the Ultra and Mino, but HP just announced its own model, the V1020H, which is most notable for its price, $109, about half what you could pay for high-def Flip. It shoots in 720p HD and takes SDHC cards, which mean you can load up on storage for cheap. At this price, it's likely missing zoom and image stabilization, but for quick travel clips, it might be just the thing. Out this summer.
By Mike Haney on February 18, 2010 1:48 PM
|3 Comments
Last week I found myself stuck in London for an extra day, and was absolutely paralyzed with possibilities for what to do with it. I ended up wandering the National Gallery and seeing Oliver because I found myself near them, and eating at a horribly mediocre pub recommended by the front desk. I know the "in" thing to do these days is to reach out to the Face/Twit universe in such a situation, but shouldn't there be Web sites that solve this problem for us social-media-challenged people: I'm in a city, what should I absolutely do?
Of course there are sites like TripAdvisor (an endless sea of reviews), Yelp and TimeOut (useful for the cities they cover), but it turns out there are several dedicated itinerary planning sites, including the newly launched Goby, that promise to smartly comb the Web and find you the ideal activities. Here's a look at a few:
Goby is co-founded by an MIT professor and purports to smartly search the "deep Web" to find you relevant and highly rated activities. Pick a general category, location and time period, and it spits back a list of options and their source: yelp, local sites, even MySpace. In some sample queries I put in, it looked a little unfocused and it wasn't clear how or if results are ranked.
GoPlanIt has been around a while and does a similar scraping from other sites to come up with a list of suggested activities, lodgings, etc. But it also lets you create an itinerary you can then print, share or access from your phone, and you can browse other people's saved itineraries. The site also includes percentage rankings on its results, based on the number of positive reviews an item has gotten on other sites. Perhaps it just benefits from maturity, but it feels like a trustworthier source.
TripWiser has also been around a bit and takes an even more social approach, drawing almost exclusively on its users' recommendations and itineraries, which makes it a little thin and a little clunky. One useful feature, however, is the Road Trip Planner—it's still crowd-sourced, but somehow that works better with a more focused category like "road trip."
I'd love to hear about other sites I'm missing and how you figure out where to go in new cities.
By Mike Haney on February 9, 2010 10:43 AM
|No Comments
A couple of weeks ago, we wrote about how great a travel accessory the iPad will be, and travel guru Randy Peterson of flyertalk.com offered in the comments a number of additional uses for the iPad on the road: watching movies, reading books and newspapers, browsing SkyMall (he was kidding, I think, but a SkyMall app would be brilliant ... if it worked offline). So in that spirit, we're trying to think of more scenarios in which the iPad could be game-changing for travelers. Today's idea: the ultimate portable jukebox.
I know what you're thinking: Didn't they already announce the iPod about eight years ago? And doesn't the iPad max out at a paltry 64 gigabytes of storage? And you'd be right of course on both, but that's missing the point. The iPad isn't for carrying, it's for accessing.
The guys at Gizmodo, along with their readers, have been running a standardized speed test on as many Wi-Fi-enabled flights as they can the past several weeks to figure out who provides the speediest connection. The verdict: Delta!
But before you go changing your flights, a few caveats. They only tested four airlines: American, Virgin America, Delta and AirTran, and all of those use GoGo as their provider. (Aircell's GoGo uses ground-based stations, while Row 44, the supplier for Alaskan Air and soon Southwest, uses satellites.) And Glenn Fleishman of WiFiNetNews weighs in to say that this may not be as definitive as it sounds, since speeds can vary widely based on how many people are using the service on any given flight. "Speedtest tries to suck all available bandwidth," he adds, "so it can only test how much is remaining or how much is provisioned to an individual user."
I tried GoGo for the first time on a Delta flight to San Francisco a couple of weeks ago and while I had no issues with browsing speed, the sign-up was a nightmare, burning half my battery before I had a steady connection. The help chat folks were great, but we kept getting cut off while trying to troubleshoot. Not sure I'd go through that again for $10-$12 (the price inexplicably changed while I was trying to sign up.) Here's a great chart from Jaunted.com of the various Wi-Fi options and costs.
What's your in-flight Wi-Fi experience been like, both in terms of speed and service?
By Alex Pasquariello on February 4, 2010 3:56 PM
|2 Comments
Up in the air: Ship deck and lounge chairs taken to a whole new level with the Aircruise
Is slow the new luxury? That’s the philosophy behind a conceptual design for a floating airship / hotel released by London-based firm Seymourpowell yesterday.
The Aircruise is a 265-meter high, kite-shaped airship with four hydrogen-filled envelopes that will carry a maximum of 100 guests and crew on extended voyages floating up to 12,000 feet above the earth.
While the theoretical design is capable of lifting up to 396,000 KG and air speeds of 150 KM per hour, designer Nick Talbot says zipping around the globe with tons of people packed on board is not the goal.
"The Aircruise concept questions whether the future of luxury travel should be based around space-constrained, resource-hungry, and all too often stressful airline travel," Nick Talbot, head of transportation at Seymourpowell, told CNN. READ MORE >>
By Mike Haney on February 2, 2010 1:00 PM
|1 Comment
A colleague and I were chatting about the iPad last week and I suggested that the conspicuous absence of a camera might have been a bone to AT&T's already overloaded data networks: no camera, no video chatting. To which my colleague asked, "But who video chats?"
I think the iPhone is the perfect travel gadget, but the newly announced iPad might just take its place with several features that are music to a road-warrior's ears—10-hours of battery, iBookstore, a screen you won't have to squint at to watch movies. But most significant (and surprising) is that the version of the device that connects to a cellular data network is unlocked, right out of the box.
That means that unlike the iPhone, the iPad isn't locked to AT&T's network. So when you go overseas, you can pick up a local sim card (a thumbnail-size plastic bit that tells the device what network to use) and pop online without paying the exorbitant data-roaming rates. (This is also possible with the iPhone, but requires some software hackery.) Unlocked phones are common outside the US, but rare here, since carriers usually subsidize the price of the phone itself. But since you'll be paying for every penny of this yourself ($500-$830 depending on options), I guess Apple convinced AT&T to loosen the cuffs.
What do you think? Will you snatch up an iPad to be your road computer?Let me know in the comments space below.
Search TripTech
About TripTech
Mike Haney is Condé Nast Traveler's contributing technology editor and executive editor of Popular Science magazine. He hates being a fanboy but believes the iPhone is the greatest travel accessory ever invented and thinks free Wi-Fi should be a basic human right.